The
insurgency took place at a time when Gambia was at a crossroads. The
Government had just requested over one billion dalasis as supplementary
appropriation to the 2014 budgetary allocation of 10.2 billion dalasis.
459 million dalasis went to the Office of President to cover cost such
as expenditure on national celebrations amounting to 86 million dalasis;
travelling expenses were put at 186 million dalasis; hotel
accommodation was put at 96 million.
The above is contained in a statement issued by the opposition
People’s Democratic for Organisation, Independence and Socialism. The
statement, issued by Halifa Sallah, was made public after reflections on
the December 30th insurgency.
Read below the statement verbatim:
The Central Committee of PDOIS has had a briefing on all the shades
of opinion expressed by the sovereign Gambian people and members of the
international community on the 30th December armed insurrection and has
seen the need to put its appraisal across with the hope of influencing
national and international public opinion on the way forward for the
Gambian people.
History teaches us that people have their diverse interests and
aspirations but each situation has its realities, demands, urgencies and
possibilities. No aspiration could be realistic if it goes beyond the
realm of reality, necessity and possibility. This was why we decided to
analyse the circumstances which surrounded the armed attack and
indicated with overwhelming thoroughness why the outcome could only be
what it was.
We chose not to pass judgment and issue condemnation because of the
futility of the exercise. We preferred to analyse, draw lessons and make
recommendations on the realistic way forward. It is futile for us to
utter condemnation because we were here in 1994 when an unconstitutional
takeover of government succeeded. At that time many expressed their
support for the coup. Our party leadership was offered two ministerial
posts but we turned them down. We indicated that since power belongs to
the sovereign people of the Gambia, we are committed to only participate
in a government derived from the unalloyed consent of the people. We
analysed the factors which gave rise to the 1994 coup and called on the
coup makers to respect the fundamental rights and freedoms of the
people, including the rights of political parties to continue to exist.
We proposed the convening of a National Conference to prepare the way
for the rebirth of a constitutional and democratic order based on
national consensus. Many people then accused us of being unrealistic
and being idealistic.
In our view, coups are supported by many when they succeed and
condemned by many when they fail. Losers are always publicly disowned by
many who would have welcomed them as saviours if they had succeeded.
Therefore, we should put condemnation or endorsement aside and ask these
simple questions: After 30 years of PPP and 20 years of AFPRC/APRC
rule, without power ever being transferred from one democratically
elected government to another, should the Gambian people continue to be
spectators of history, or should they finally take a stand and become
architects of their own free, dignified and prosperous destiny? Should
they wait for saviours, or should they become their own saviours? These
are fundamental questions which should exercise the minds of every
Gambian. Posterity is demanding an urgent answer. Hence the national
debate on these questions should begin right now. Postponing it is to
pay deaf ears to the demands of destiny.
How to Put the Incident behind Us
The Gambian people are yet to receive any statement from those who took
part in the insurgency. By now they should have been able to do a
debriefing and give accurate information to the public. What type of
government did they intend to form? What was going to be its tenure in
office? What instrument did it intend to put in place to govern?
The information we have so far received is from the affidavit signed
by Nicholas L Marshall, of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the
statement issued by the Government of the Gambia.
The two sources have slightly different narrations on the
insurrection. According to the narration from Mr. Marshall’s
affidavit, which is based on an interview conducted after the arrest of
Papa Faal, who has since pleaded guilty and has been granted bail, the
insurgents were divided into two operational teams namely; Alpha and
Bravo teams. The composition of the teams was not mentioned.The Alpha
team was supposed to have attacked from the front of the statehouse,
while the Bravo team was supposed to attack from the rear. This team was
led by Papa Faal. According to Faal, one of his team members, Musa
Sarr, was killed in an attempt to drive a car to break the state house
door. Faal claimed that the two teams lost radio communication once the
operation started thus causing his team to retreat. He left with the
impression that all the members of the Alpha team were killed.
According to the statement issued by the Government of the Gambia,
five insurgents launched their attack from the main gate of the state
house. They were identified as Former Lt. Colonel Lamin Sanneh, Capt.
Njagga Jagne, Baboucarr Lowe, Modou Njie and Landing Sonko. According to
them, Sanneh and Jagne were killed, Njie captured and Lowe and Sonko
escaped.
The attackers from the rear gate were reported to include Papa Faal,
Musa Sarr, Dawda Bojang and Nyass. Papa Faal and Musa Sarr are
reported to have escaped, while Dawda and Alhagie Nyass are reported to
have been killed.
The FBI report quoted Papa Faal’s narration of the death of Musa Sarr, but the Government’s statement spoke about his escape.
The other names mentioned by the statement of the Government as
members of the group, who were stationed at Brufut Heights, are the
Interim leader Cherno Njie, Alhagie Barrow, Dawda Bojang and Mustapha
Faal who is reported to have deserted the group before the operation
was launched. The same Dawda Bojang is reported to have been killed as
one of the insurgents who attacked from the rear.
The Duty of the Government
The information in the public space regarding the identity of the
people killed lends credibility to the need to conduct coroner’s inquest
to confirm the identity of those killed as a result of the
insurrection.
PDOIS calls on the Government to conduct a coroner’s inquest to
establish the identities of the dead bodies. This should be followed by
handing over the bodies to the families concerned for burial.
Needless to say, the key insurgents are known. To enlarge the arrests
to include children, brothers and parents of alleged insurgents and to
detain them beyond 72 hours amounts to a fishing expedition aimed at
achieving nothing but more outcries against violation of fundamental
rights and freedoms.
Lesson should be drawn from the experience of the child who was under
detention for more than 72 hours despite repeated exposure. The child
and another teenager were released after 43 days in detention without
trial.
PDOIS would like to draw the attention of the government to section 66
Subsection 1 of the Children’s Act, which states that “it is the duty of
the government of the Gambia to safeguard, protect and promote the
welfare of children.”
Section 5 guarantees that the child should enjoy all the rights
enshrined in the constitution including freedom from arbitrary arrest
and detention.
In the same vein, it amounts to a cruel and degrading treatment by
simply relying on a person’s blood ties or relation with an insurgent to
put him or her under arbitrary arrest and detention.
PDOIS calls on the government not to cast its net beyond the waters of
Law, reason and justice to hunt down insurgents. Its duty is to govern
according to the dictates of the constitution, the law and standard
democratic practice.
We call for the release of all those who are detained in connection
with the insurgency who are not charged and taken before court within 72
hours before the commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the
declaration of Independence.
In the same vein, the legal advisers of the government should
conclude whether those who were involved in the insurgency allegedly
perpetrated an act of terrorism or a coup attempt, and immediately
prefer charges so that there would be no undue delay in leaving the
courts to determine guilt or innocence of those charged.
Gambia at a Crossroads
The insurgency took place at a time when Gambia was at a crossroads.
The Government had just requested over one billion dalasis as
supplementary appropriation to the 2014 budgetary allocation of 10.2
billion dalasis. 459 million dalasis went to the Office of President to
cover cost such as expenditure on national celebrations amounting to 86
million dalasis; travelling expenses were put at 186 million dalasis;
hotel accommodation was put at 96 million.
This supplementary appropriation came at a time when the domestic debt of the Gambia had risen to astronomical proportions.
Any supplementary appropriation is likely to lead to the
growth of the domestic debt which already stands at 16.75 billion
dalasis, or 45 percent of GDP.
Revenue shortfalls and expenditure overruns have been a chronic
fiscal illness requiring the government to give renewed promises on an
annual basis to embark on fiscal discipline but to no avail.
Rise in interest payments to the tune of 1.4 billion dalasis for the
first nine months of 2014 conveys a trend towards a debt driven public
expenditure programme, which runs counter to the agreements made with
the IMF to reduce domestic borrowing as the prime object of fiscal
discipline.
Revenue Contraction or Rise in The Tax Burden
Grants have served as a major shock absorber in cushioning the impact
of expenditure slippages and have augmented the volume of foreign
currency which had immensely contributed to preventing a rapid decline
in the value of the currency.
Needless to say, the deadlock between the EU and the government on
their political dialogue, the abortion of the trip of the special
Rapporteurs of the UN, and the general attitude of the government
towards criticisms on the practice of detention without trial and other
human rights violations, combine to weaken its capacity to attract more
grants.
In the face of dimmer prospects for the requisite donor support, the
economic fundamentals are also under threat. Government has recorded a
60 per cent decline in tourist arrivals for 2014/2015. Agricultural
output is projected to decline by 15 per cent. The government has
acknowledged that total crop production is estimated to be 292,581
metric tons of which Cereal production is estimated at 201,805 tons,
representing a drop of 11 percent over last year. Government has
acknowledged that compared to the five year average, total crop
production has shown a decrease of 6 percent while production of cereals
has dropped by 3 percent. Hence self sufficiency in food production
remains a blurred vision instead of a realistic prospect and will remain
so as long as the current policies persist.
Decline in tourist arrivals and crop production would impact on the
foreign exchange earning capacity of the country, reduce the value of
the dalasi, increase inflation and threaten the foreign reserves of the
country.
It is not a surprise that as at the end of September 2014 the dalasi
has depreciated against the dollar by 23.8percent, against the Euro by
17.8 and 22.1 percent against the pound sterling.
The decline in both services and agricultural production, which have
been the engines of domestic growth, has given rise to a decline in the
growth of GDP to 2 per cent.
High government borrowing has resulted in high interest rates and the
crowding out of the private sector. This increase in domestic borrowing
is not sustainable.
Hence, the Government has indicated that it would restrict domestic borrowing to 1 percent of GDP as at 31ST December 2015.
This could only be done without increasing taxes, or reducing public
expenditure by introducing cost recovery, if public enterprises could
pay dividends into the public purse. The absence of a viable public
investment policy has crippled many public enterprises and has rendered
them incapable of generating dividends to cushion revenue earnings
from non tax sources.
Hence, the government may try to cope by increasing taxes, reducing
expenditure, or increasing cost recovery for public services.
The IMF has acknowledged the growing imbalances experienced by the
Gambian economy, and is considering the possibility of introducing a
“Rapid Credit Facility” arrangement under a programme monitored by the
institution, so that the government would adopt corrective measures.
PDOIS wants to emphasise that the most the IMF could do is to assist a
government to maintain balance of payment viability by restricting
borrowing, restrain expenditure on public services, remove subsidies,
increase cost recovery for public services,broaden the tax base and
raise taxes. This has already started with the removal of subsidies on
fuel and the increase in hospital charges. Suffice it to say, all these
measures would lead to increase in public hardship. When that happens,
one should not focus on the IMFconditions, on the contrary, one should
look at the policies of the government which gave birth to monitoring
and supervision by a multinational agency.
We want to emphasise that corrective measures could only come when
the fundamentals of the economy are altered. PDOIS would ensure that
public enterprises are managed to ensure the payment of dividends into
the public purse based on management contract arising from objective
assessment of their potential, and administrative sanctions would be
fully put in place for breach of contract by management that will be
free from political interference.
There is no financial logic in allowing Social Security and Housing
Finance Corporation investing hundreds of millions to purchase hotels
only to lease them. This constitutes an unproductive tying of Capital to
a domain which is not viable for public investment.
Furthermore, we will enhance food self sufficiency and agricultural
exports by introducing a cooperative bank which will give seeds,
fertiliser and appropriate farming implements to family farms so that
they would be able to engage in large scale farming for both consumption
and for exports. The bank will provide secure and timely financing to
ensure purchase of agricultural produce.
In addition to creating the environment for self sustaining families,
we will also expand agricultural production to create self sustaining
villages by encouraging the establishment of village farms, fishing
ponds, eco-tourist sites, etc so that the earnings will be invested to
improve village infrastructure.
We will link agricultural production with processing to generate
value added goods to expand economic growth and employment. This is what
the Programme for accelerated growth and employment failed to do.
PDOIS will create a Corporation that will guide banks to invest in
the private sector and map out the incentives and security, which would
accrue in case of foreign direct investment by corporations committed to
the fulfillment of corporate responsibility to promote general welfare.
The Public Corporations would coordinate initiatives with the Gambia
Chamber of Commerce and Industry so that all matters affecting the
private sector such as taxes, minimum wage, interest rates and the
business climate would be periodically discussed to create informed
policies conducive to profitability, growth, employment and general
welfare. We will not engage in any economic adventurism but would work
with all stakeholders to promote pro -employment, pro- better wages and
pro -general welfare policies while cushioning the productive base to be
able to produce the sovereign national wealth requisite for National
development and general welfare. If the Greek leaders take such a
direction they are likely to succeed. If they pursue economic
adventurism they are likely to fail.
PDOIS will provide better financial management by ensuring that the
public is involved at all stages of the budgeting and implementation
process. Social auditing will be introduced to ensure that the members
of the public know what is provided for each public institution for
service delivery and the media will be protected by freedom of
information laws and be empowered to hold public officers accountable to
the public.
PDOIS will promote efficient delivery of public services by rewarding
public servants on the basis of the quantity and quality of work done
which would enhance their desire to be accountable. PDOIS will strive to
maintain a minimum wage which will be responsible to the bread basket
adequate for survival.
On the Issue of Political stability and Liberty
PDOIS is committed to the values of a Secular Democratic Republic.
Unlike the atheist or theocratic concept of the state, secularism calls
for the neutrality of the state in matters of religion, philosophy and
belief and imposes a duty on the executive, the legislature and the
judiciary and their agents to protect the right of each to freedom to
hold and practice one’s religion or hold on to a philosophy or belief
without being subjected to any persecution.
Furthermore, secularism must give rise to a culture of tolerance
where each citizen respects the rights of others and would have the
humility never to abuse one’s right by infringing on the rights of
others.
Politically, we will strive to introduce a two four year term limit and thus put an end to any need for a coup.
All Gambians in particular and human beings in general, who are on
trial, in detention or at liberty, need protection of law. Hence human
rights defenders and the media will be encouraged to hold state agencies
and agents to account to prevent and redress the violation of rights.
We will welcome external human rights monitors as advisers to perfect
our system of government to improve the quality of life of our people,
and would not see them as inspectors aiming to interfere with our
sovereignty. Only tyrants would feel offended for being told to treat
their citizens as human beings everywhere, ought to be treated. PDOIS
would build an environment which is friendly to human tights defenders.
THE WAY FORWARD
Some Gambians abroad told the international media that the armed
insurrection was a by- product of a political power vacuum in the
country. They presented the opposition in the Gambia as fragile and
ineffective. Gambians need to interrogate this notion of the opposition
before we could take any step forward.
What constitutes a strong and effective opposition? A strong and
effective opposition is one that scrutinises and criticises a government
and holds it to account, while putting across its alternative policies
to show proof that it can provide a better leadership.
We cannot speak for other parties, but we can say without any fear of
exaggeration that PDOIS is doing what a strong and effective opposition
party should do.
We scrutinise and criticise every shortcoming of all the instruments
and institutions of the state and practices of their agents. We also
propose alternatives on how to do things better.
The hypothesis of a political vacuum does not stand the test of
objective analysis. We need to revisit this notion. To assist those
who want to take an informed position on the subject in order to map out
a realistic way forward, allow us to state that consciousness and
organisation are the basis to effect democratic change in any country.
Hence the Gambian people have to ask themselves whether there exist
opposition parties whose policies are worth supporting. If so, they
should not consider that party to be weak because of past elections
results. What they should do is to support such a party to intensify
its work among the masses, to increase its support base to win
elections.
Power in politics is two-fold. There is the power of ideas and the
power of mass organisation. The power of ideas empowers an opposition
party to have the ability to shape public opinion and further influence
those who control political power to be on their guard by exposing acts
of impunity.
The power of mass support empowers an opposition party to have
authority to make demands that must be listened and attended to by a
government before elections, and convince the undecided voters that it
could replace a government whenever elections are due.
PDOIS needs the power of mass support. Even if alliance becomes
necessary, only strong parties with strong mass base can form and
influence successful alliances and prevent the derailing of the
aspirations of the people.
Consciousness and organisation are the key instruments for change. We
are moving about from village to village to sensitise and organise
those who agree with us. Encourage all parties to do the same. Let us
all promote the battle of policies rather than wrangling based on
sentiments and prejudices. Think and own your mind. It is in that
sovereign mind where the liberty of all lies. Only a person who loves
freedom more than any other thing on earth could work selflessly to free
a nation. Be yourself and take ownership of your country. Liberty and
prosperity shall be your reward. History is waiting to record your
contribution .Spectators do not become the architects of their own
destiny. Only activists could take charge of their destiny and shape it
to enjoy liberty, dignity and prosperity. The time has arrived. The time
is now.
The End
CHADIAN troops have won another major victory in the ongoing battle against Boko Haram by recapturing the town of Dikwa in Borno State from the terrorists after a major battle during which hundreds of insurgents were killed.
This is the most naive political statement I have ever heard . So mai fatty, it means you and every Gambians who disagreed with dictator Jammeh, have wronged him and should seek forgiveness. What a disgrace? Jammeh should rather seek forgiveness from gambians whose families he killed , disappeared , forced exiled , tortured , inprisoned , and above all the whole country for his despotic and evil rule . So you subscribed to the misleading belief that Jammeh is good Muslim who care about Gambians. It is naive to think and act the same way as jammeh in using religion as justification for his recent outburst which is full of threat. The Video which every one watched has no indication of reconciliation but it was full of threat , and self righteousness. Clearly mr fatty, you are really desperate to have reconcilation with jammeh but you need to be careful because jammeh is unpredictable and cannot be trusted. Political naivety is the result of why jammeh is still in power. You are quick to endorse and praise him without critical analysis of his pronouncement . How about the ten people who he indicated that he won’t forgive , you don’t care about those people ? Your endorsement is even more dangerous than Jammeh’s outburst because it give legitimacy to Jammeh’s statement. What policy did Jammeh put In place before this outburst ? The answer is none. Did he mention any policy after this outburst for you to quickly endorsed him? The answer is none . Over the years, Jammeh knew that you are all bunch of cowards who hide behind the name of opposition without any principles to fight what you claimed to believe. How many false promises did Jammeh make over the years? A real opposition are on the ground who are ready to sacrifice their life and they do not quickly endorse any outburst from Jammeh but they ask relevant questions and critically examine the situation. These are the men of substance who have principles and a cause to fight, not just cheap political popularity.
We are no kids for Mai to play with our intelligence. We know very well that recently Mai made few visits to Ghana and president Mahama of Ghana his God Father must have convince him to play the peace ball for some reason, therefore this 180° turnabout is the least what we expect of him. Gambians should by now do a proper research on who John Mahama really is. Make the connections between Jammeh, Chambers and Mahama and see if anything ticks between the four including Mai. Who knows if Mai was promised the presidency against a general amnesty for Jammeh? Mahama being the current sitting president for ECOWAS, whiles we know that this institution refused to recognize the 2011 presidential elections in the Gambia speaks volumes. We also know that Jammeh is looking for an EXIT strategy, we know for a fact that he has been seriously warned to consider handing over the presidency preferably in March 2016 in an orderly manner in other to benefit from some king protection from the International community. Jammeh is on very tight corner and Mai Fatty the new cavalier in the hood is an acceptable option for him. The Blaise Compaore syndrome is being dangled on JK’s head by the International community as a serious warning for Jammeh to take heed.
Sure enough Mai Fatty is on a mission and a deal. Let him clear the air.