Beirut) – Saudi courts are sentencing prominent reform advocates, activists, and writers to lengthy jail terms – and even death – on vague charges related to the peaceful exercise of free expression.
Most recently, on December 21, 2015, a Saudi court sentenced Zuhair Kutbi, a peaceful critic who called for domestic political reform, to four years in prison, a five-year travel ban, and a 15-year ban on media appearances. It is only the latest in a series of harsh judgments against peaceful advocates during King Salman’s first year.
“Human rights advocates hoped that King Salman would rein in his country’s repression of peaceful dissidents, but the authorities harass and jail people for peacefully expressing reform-oriented opinions,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director. “The king should put an end to this sustained assault on free expression and release all peaceful activists and writers.”
During 2015, at least six men, including prominent writers, dissidents, and reform advocates, were punished for peaceful expression of their opinions. One was sentenced to death and the others to lengthy prison terms. At least four were also banned from traveling abroad for five to 10 years. Most faced broad, catch-all charges designed to criminalize peaceful dissent, such as “sowing discord,” “reducing the government’s prestige,” and “inciting public opinion.” The Specialized Criminal Court, set up in 2008 to try terrorism cases but often used to prosecute peaceful dissidents, convicted four of the men.
The authorities have harassed Kutbi for his peaceful writings since the 1990s and have detained him at least six times, according to Saudi activists. His most recent arrest followed an hour-long appearance on the television program Fi al-Sameem (In-Depth), on the Arabic satellite channel Rotana Khalejia. Kutbi spoke about what he regarded as necessary reforms, including transforming the country into a constitutional monarchy and combating religious and political repression.
The court convicted Kutbi on December 21, 2015, on a host of vague charges, including “sowing discord,” “inciting public opinion,” and “reducing the government’s prestige,” according to court documents Human Rights Watch reviewed, primarily based on Kutbi’s tweets, writings, and calls for a constitutional monarchy. The court also decided that Kutbi’s media appearances violated a 2013 pledge not to “incite public opinion,” which he made in relation to other writings.
In addition to his prison term, which was reduced to two years, and the bans on travel and writing, he was fined 100,000 Saudi riyal (US$26,634) and ordered to delete his Twitter account and the websites he maintained that were mentioned in the case.
On November 18, 2015, an appeals court upheld a sentence of two years and 200 lashes against Mikhlif al-Shammari, a well-known human rights activist, for, in part, “sitting with Shia” citizens. Al-Shammari has sought to improve relations between Sunnis and Shia and made national headlines in 2008 when he visited a Shia mosque in Qatif and prayed next to a Shia religious leader in a show of solidarity.
On November 17, a Saudi court sentenced a Palestinian man to death for apostasy for alleged blasphemous statements in a discussion group and a book of his poetry. Ashraf Fayadh, 35, denied the charges and claimed that another man made false accusations to the country’s religious police following a personal dispute.
In October, the Specialized Criminal Court sentenced three men to extended prison terms in separate trials. Two of them, Abd al-Kareem al-Khodr and Dr. Abd al-Rahman al-Hamid, were among the co-founders of the banned Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association (ACPRA), several members of which had already been imprisoned for their activism. The third, Abd al-Aziz al-Snaidi, is an independent dissident. The sentences ranged from eight to 10 years, plus eight- to 10-year travel bans. All of the charges against the three men were tied solely to the men’s peaceful advocacy.
In addition to the most recent convictions, more than a dozen prominent Saudi activists are serving long jail sentences as a result of their peaceful activism, including Waleed Abu al-Khair and Fadhil al-Manasif, both sentenced to 15 years in prison by the Specialized Criminal Court as a result of their peaceful human rights work.
Saudi authorities regularly pursue charges against human rights activists based on their peaceful exercise of freedom of expression, in violation of international human rights obligations. The Arab Charter on Human Rights, which Saudi Arabia has ratified, guarantees the right to freedom of opinion and expression in Article 32. The United Nations General Assembly’s Declaration on the Rights of Human Rights Defenders states that everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to “impart or disseminate to others views, information and knowledge on all human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
“Outlandish sentences against peaceful activists and dissidents demonstrate Saudi Arabia’s complete intolerance toward citizens who speak out for human rights and reform,” Whitson said. “Saudi Arabia shouldn’t be sending people to prison for their peaceful opinions, and these cases certainly have no business in a terrorism court.”
source:https://www.hrw.org
Monday, 11 January 2016
Monday, 17 August 2015
Sam Sarr,s Lies Exposed
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Family Members of the TWO MISSING US – CITIZENS, RESPOND TO FIRST STATEMENT FROM THE GAMBIA GOVERNMENT ISSUED BY A GAMBIAN DIPLOMAT MR SAMSUDEEN SARR
USA – August 11, 2015 – We the family members of the two missing Gambian US Citizens wish to issue this press release in response to recent statements made by a Gambian Diplomat Mr Samsudeen Sarr. He was responding to Susan Rice National Security adviser to the President of the United States of America.
In a statement released by the White House Susan Rice, a former US Permanent Representative to the UN (and now advisor to President Obama) said, The United States is deeply concerned about credible reports of torture, suspicious disappearances – including two American citizens.
Mr Sarr in response to Ms Rice’s statement is quoted as follows “reports of the two missing Americans – Alhagie Ceesay and Ebou Jobe, is nothing but another dubious story fed to US authorities by the enemies of President Jammeh…”
We the families of Alhagie and Ebou, who have been living in agony, who feel the pain every day, are out to present further evidence to set the records straight. The kids who have celebrated 2 years without any knowledge of the whereabouts of their fathers will tell you this is not a story but daily reality as they continue to struggle through this nightmare. The sisters, brothers, cousins, friends and especially the moms and wives of Alhagie and Ebou, will tell you the pain, sadness, tears they have shed is not a dubious story but a reality they wished everyday was just a dream that they can wake up from.
The deputy chief of mission at the United Nation’s further went on to say “Nothing is more absurd than the arrest of foreign investors or prospective business partners going to The Gambia to perform positive work. Hundreds go there every year to invest without incidents…”
Alhagie and Ebou went to the Gambia to invest and contribute to The Gambia economy. The two had a lease agreement for the office space they rented while in The Gambia. Please find attached signed copies (by Ebou Jobe) of the Lease.
Mr Sarr said “There is no record of the two Americans at any of The West African nation’s entry points”.
Alhagie and Ebou left the US on May 14th and arrived in Dakar on May 15th (via SN Brussels UA # 237, Record Locator MV8Y39 – attached). Upon arrival in Dakar, they were told their bags did not make it and will be sent separately.
Their bags were sent through the airline Banjul Bird and the bags arrived on May 19 (see attached bag tags). The bags were collected the same day from the Yundum Airport.
Based on credible eye witness accounts (which has already been reported to the U.S State Department and FBI), Alhagie & Ebou went to watch a concert on the night of June 22 2013. On their way home from the event, their car was stopped and they were arrested, this was the last time they had any contacts with the outside world.
The families hold the Gambia Government fully responsible for the disappearance of the two as the NIA is a branch of the government and the two were last seen in their custody.
Mr Sarr went on to state that “Ms Rice appeared to fall for the same trick of talking about a situation that she is least familiar with.” He further went on to say “Susan Rice should realize that politics from thousands of miles away is not as near the same as politics in the United States”.
The family knows the US government is extremely familiar with this case. Ms Rice is very familiar with the politics of Africa as her initial work in peace keeping took her to Rwanda and later as a senior Director to African Missions. She was later the top African diplomat during the East African bombings.
We hope that if Mr Sarr was not familiar with this case before that he will now be.
The family is not the least surprised that such statements are coming from The Gambian diplomat Mr Sarr, based on his credibility.
The family is not the least surprised that such statements are coming from The Gambian diplomat Mr Sarr, based on his credibility.
Mr Sarr authored a book titled COUP D’ETAT in which he narrated in an explicit way how he was being tortured at Mile Two in the mid-nineties. He recently retracted accounts of his book, stating that he fabricated stories against the government of President Jammeh.
To Mr Sarr his life may be full of stories and therefore everything around him is fiction. For the Ceesay and Jobe Family, this is reality with human lives involved. This is not a chapter in the COUP D’ETAT Novel.
We are hopeful that The Government of the Gambia will release Alhagie and Ebou just like they have recently released many prisoners, so that their young kids will be able to spend their next birthdays with their fathers.
Contact:
oceesay
freealhagieandebou@gmail.com
oceesay
freealhagieandebou@gmail.com
CC List: US Embassy Banjul, Ministry of foreign affairs, State Department, Gambia Online Media Houses, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Freedom House, Amnesty International, Humans Rights Watch, Senator Harry Reid, Senator Dean Heller.
Ends
Jammeh’s Sham Amnesty
President Jammeh has done it again. This time trying to gain the confidence of the world by releasing some of his former military friends who were imprisoned on various treasonable charges. There are various theories advanced as to why Jammeh may have come with the release of over 200 prisoners, some of them on death-row. The president’s own supporters have attributed it to Jammeh’s kind hearted nature and claimed that it is unprecedented in human history even though in neighbouring Senegal, over 500 prisoners were released earlier this year. It is clear also that the prison release took place in a period of intense pressure that the Gambian leadership is going through. On December, 30 2014, a handful of Gambian dissidents carried out a daring attempt to capture the president. Their attempt failed but succeeded in projecting international media attention on the state of autocratic rule in The Gambia. The Government of The Gambia also faced severe economic difficulties in recent year following the suspension of donor support from various multilateral partners due to Jammeh’s human rights violations.
Although Jammeh’s supporters tried to make political capital out of the amnesty, it was carried out with conditions attached. First the released prisoners were paraded before the state media to express their appreciation to the president and to hail him as the kind and sympathetic leader, even though many of the released prisoners were never brought before any court of law. They were also warned by the Interior Minister to desist from saying anything critical of the country’s leadership.
However, majority of Gambians thanked God that the innocent prisoners have regained their freedom. But questions still remain about the whereabouts of the many missing Gambians, such as Daba Marenah, Chief Ebrima Manneh and Kanyiba Kanyi. Gambians are demanding that Jammeh’s government provide information on the fate of all missing individuals. We demand the right of families to visit them at whichever prison they may be in.
In addition, Gambians are making the ultimate demand for Jammeh to step down from the presidency. It is unsatisfactory to resort to half-hearted measures, such as the prisoner release, resulting from the mounting pressure the regime is coming under. Such measures are not enough for our country and for the future of its people. They are only meant to enable Jammeh buy time and revert to the dictatorial rule he is better at doing. Jammeh’s resignation will pave the way for national reconciliation, freedom, democracy and socio-economic development that we yearn for our country.
Ends
Source. www.kaironews.com
Wednesday, 8 July 2015
OPPOSITION PARTIES DEMANDS FOR ELECTORAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS
Six Gambian political parties in the opposition have jointly presented
a set of 12 proposals and demands for electoral and constitutional
reforms before a new electoral cycle begins in 2016, as contained in a
press release issued on 30 June 2015.The concern political parties are the GMC, GPDP, NRP, PDOIS, PPP and UDP.
Below is the full text of the press release:
press release issued on 30 June 2015.The concern political parties are the GMC, GPDP, NRP, PDOIS, PPP and UDP.
Below is the full text of the press release:
PRESS RELEASE ON THE 11TH May PROPOSAL AND DEMANDS OF THE OPPOSITION
FOR ELECTORAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM
In response to the general consensus among the opposition and
election monitors of the need for electoral reform in the Gambia to
promote free, fair and credible elections, six opposition parties held
a series of meetings to take stock of all the constitutional, legal,
procedural and administrative challenges confronting the electoral
system and have on 11th May 2015 formulated a comprehensive set of
demands and proposals for electoral reform, aimed at ensuring the
creation of a level political architecture for holding free, fair and
genuine elections and have forwarded them to the President of the
Republic of The Gambia, The Chairperson IEC, The Speaker of the
National Assembly, The Chief Justice, The Attorney General and
Minister of Justice, The Secretary General ,United Nations; The
Chairman, African Union ; The High Representative For Foreign Affairs
, EU; The Chairman , ECOWAS; The Secretary of state, United States and
Reverend Jesse Jackson .
The following is a summary of the proposals and demands for electoral
and constitutional reform to enhance participatory democracy and
undiluted choice in public elections.
FOR ELECTORAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM
In response to the general consensus among the opposition and
election monitors of the need for electoral reform in the Gambia to
promote free, fair and credible elections, six opposition parties held
a series of meetings to take stock of all the constitutional, legal,
procedural and administrative challenges confronting the electoral
system and have on 11th May 2015 formulated a comprehensive set of
demands and proposals for electoral reform, aimed at ensuring the
creation of a level political architecture for holding free, fair and
genuine elections and have forwarded them to the President of the
Republic of The Gambia, The Chairperson IEC, The Speaker of the
National Assembly, The Chief Justice, The Attorney General and
Minister of Justice, The Secretary General ,United Nations; The
Chairman, African Union ; The High Representative For Foreign Affairs
, EU; The Chairman , ECOWAS; The Secretary of state, United States and
Reverend Jesse Jackson .
The following is a summary of the proposals and demands for electoral
and constitutional reform to enhance participatory democracy and
undiluted choice in public elections.
1. PROTECTION OF FRANCHISE
The opposition observed that section 39 of the constitution of the
Gambia guarantees the right of all Gambians, who are 18 years and
above, being resident at home or abroad, to be registered as voters
and to vote at public elections. The right of Gambians resident abroad
to be registered as voters and to vote is also statutorily granted by
Section 11 and Section 141 of the Elections Act.
Therefore the Opposition demands among other things the recognition
and observance of the right of all Gambians to be registered as voters
and to vote, irrespective of whether they are resident at home or
abroad.
It is further proposed for general registration of voters to be
conducted a year before the beginning of each electoral cycle and
supplementary registration of voters be conducted annually during an
electoral cycle, comprising presidential, national Assembly and
council elections.
Further measures were proposed aimed at preventing fraudulent
registration through attestation,
2. PROTECTION FROM GERRYMANDERING AND- ENSURING EQUAL
REPRESENTATION
The opposition noted that section 50 of the Constitution makes
provision “for the establishment of a Constituency Boundaries
Commission” since 2001 which has been honoured with disregard. The
absence of such a commission had led to gross imbalance in respect to
the size of constituencies thus negating the ideal situation of having
constituencies with equal population or equal number of voters, which
alone could give effect to the principle of equal number of persons
determining equal number of representatives.
Hence Kombo North constituency, which is entitled to one National
Assembly member, has 110,000 registered voters, which is more than
the number of voters registered in all the three constituencies
combined in the Banjul administrative area; all the Constituencies
combined in the Kerewan administrative area; all the 6
constituencies combined in the Mansa Konko administrative area; all
the 11 Constituencies combined in the Janjanbureh administrative
area and all the 7 constituencies combined in the Basse
administrative area, respectively.
The opposition demands the immediate enactment of the Constituency
Boundaries Commission Act and the immediate demarcation of
constituencies prior to the general registration of voters, on the
basis of the principle of equal number of inhabitants or equal number
of voters for each constituency.
It strongly recommends that, in the event of any constituency
boundaries delineation exercise, the demarcation proposed by The
Commission under the Chairmanship of Arch Bishop Tilewa Johnson be
given due consideration.
The opposition observed that section 39 of the constitution of the
Gambia guarantees the right of all Gambians, who are 18 years and
above, being resident at home or abroad, to be registered as voters
and to vote at public elections. The right of Gambians resident abroad
to be registered as voters and to vote is also statutorily granted by
Section 11 and Section 141 of the Elections Act.
Therefore the Opposition demands among other things the recognition
and observance of the right of all Gambians to be registered as voters
and to vote, irrespective of whether they are resident at home or
abroad.
It is further proposed for general registration of voters to be
conducted a year before the beginning of each electoral cycle and
supplementary registration of voters be conducted annually during an
electoral cycle, comprising presidential, national Assembly and
council elections.
Further measures were proposed aimed at preventing fraudulent
registration through attestation,
2. PROTECTION FROM GERRYMANDERING AND- ENSURING EQUAL
REPRESENTATION
The opposition noted that section 50 of the Constitution makes
provision “for the establishment of a Constituency Boundaries
Commission” since 2001 which has been honoured with disregard. The
absence of such a commission had led to gross imbalance in respect to
the size of constituencies thus negating the ideal situation of having
constituencies with equal population or equal number of voters, which
alone could give effect to the principle of equal number of persons
determining equal number of representatives.
Hence Kombo North constituency, which is entitled to one National
Assembly member, has 110,000 registered voters, which is more than
the number of voters registered in all the three constituencies
combined in the Banjul administrative area; all the Constituencies
combined in the Kerewan administrative area; all the 6
constituencies combined in the Mansa Konko administrative area; all
the 11 Constituencies combined in the Janjanbureh administrative
area and all the 7 constituencies combined in the Basse
administrative area, respectively.
The opposition demands the immediate enactment of the Constituency
Boundaries Commission Act and the immediate demarcation of
constituencies prior to the general registration of voters, on the
basis of the principle of equal number of inhabitants or equal number
of voters for each constituency.
It strongly recommends that, in the event of any constituency
boundaries delineation exercise, the demarcation proposed by The
Commission under the Chairmanship of Arch Bishop Tilewa Johnson be
given due consideration.
3. PROTECTION OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION
The opposition observed that the removal from office of three
Chairpersons of the Independent Electoral Commission and other members
by the executive prior to even serving one seven-year term and the
failure to publish the appointments in the Gazette so that the courts
could take judicial notice of them, have undermined the Independence
of the Commission and the security of tenure of its members and has
also facilitated an overstay of membership beyond the limit
established by the Constitution.
The opposition demands that all appointments of commission members be
gazetted as required by law for all subsidiary legislations and those
who have served more than two seven year terms should vacate their
seats and no member of the Commission be removed for any reason
without the setting up of a tribunal comprising three judges of
superior courts to determine any allegation of misconduct or
infirmity.
It is further proposed that the membership of the Commission be
increased to seven excluding the Chairperson so that there is a
Commissioner responsible for each of the seven Administrative Areas.
In order to instill confidence in all stakeholders and guarantee the
absolute independence of the Commission, a constitutional amendment is
proposed to make it mandatory to draw members of the Commission from
TANGO, The Gambia Bar Association, The Gambia Press Union, the Gambia
Christian Council, The Supreme Islamic Council, The Gambia Teacher’s
Union, The National Youth Council as long as they function as non
partisan civil society segments. Appointments should be sensitive to
the principle of gender equity.
The opposition observed that the removal from office of three
Chairpersons of the Independent Electoral Commission and other members
by the executive prior to even serving one seven-year term and the
failure to publish the appointments in the Gazette so that the courts
could take judicial notice of them, have undermined the Independence
of the Commission and the security of tenure of its members and has
also facilitated an overstay of membership beyond the limit
established by the Constitution.
The opposition demands that all appointments of commission members be
gazetted as required by law for all subsidiary legislations and those
who have served more than two seven year terms should vacate their
seats and no member of the Commission be removed for any reason
without the setting up of a tribunal comprising three judges of
superior courts to determine any allegation of misconduct or
infirmity.
It is further proposed that the membership of the Commission be
increased to seven excluding the Chairperson so that there is a
Commissioner responsible for each of the seven Administrative Areas.
In order to instill confidence in all stakeholders and guarantee the
absolute independence of the Commission, a constitutional amendment is
proposed to make it mandatory to draw members of the Commission from
TANGO, The Gambia Bar Association, The Gambia Press Union, the Gambia
Christian Council, The Supreme Islamic Council, The Gambia Teacher’s
Union, The National Youth Council as long as they function as non
partisan civil society segments. Appointments should be sensitive to
the principle of gender equity.
4. PROTECTION OF THE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY PRINCIPLE AND UNDILUTED CHOICE
The opposition observed that section 48 of the Constitution which was
amended was approved at a referendum in 1996 to ensure that a
President is elected by the absolute majority to guarantee undiluted
choice.
The relevant portion of the amended provision stated that
“(3) No person shall be elected as President on a first ballot unless
the votes cast in his or her favour at the election are more than
fifty per cent of the total number of votes validly cast at that
election.
.The opposition proposes the re-enactment of this constitutional
provision before the 2016 Presidential Elections.
The opposition observed that section 48 of the Constitution which was
amended was approved at a referendum in 1996 to ensure that a
President is elected by the absolute majority to guarantee undiluted
choice.
The relevant portion of the amended provision stated that
“(3) No person shall be elected as President on a first ballot unless
the votes cast in his or her favour at the election are more than
fifty per cent of the total number of votes validly cast at that
election.
.The opposition proposes the re-enactment of this constitutional
provision before the 2016 Presidential Elections.
5. PROTECTION FROM FRAUDULENT REGISTRATION PRACTICE
It is statutorily established and mandatory for every Gambian citizen
being 18 years or older to possess a national Identity card. We demand
that the National ID serves as the principal document to be produced
or an affidavit indicating its loss, defacing or destruction, to
determine age and citizenship for registration as a voter. We demand
that all those who are registered using an affidavit to appear before
a revising court to show their new ID cards or have their names struck
out.
The opposition proposes that, like the voter’s card, the ID card
should be made universally accessible, at public expense for all
Gambians 18 years or older. Cost should be involved only if
replacement is needed.
It is further proposed for the Elections Act to make provision for
each registration team to be monitored by two registration agents
appointed by each registered political party and maintained by a fund
set up for that purpose and administered by the IEC.
It is strongly recommended that street names and compound numbers of
registered voters in cities and towns and kabilo names and compound
numbers of voters in villages be included in registers of voters to
detect and serve objections against those who have unlawfully
registered as voters.
It is statutorily established and mandatory for every Gambian citizen
being 18 years or older to possess a national Identity card. We demand
that the National ID serves as the principal document to be produced
or an affidavit indicating its loss, defacing or destruction, to
determine age and citizenship for registration as a voter. We demand
that all those who are registered using an affidavit to appear before
a revising court to show their new ID cards or have their names struck
out.
The opposition proposes that, like the voter’s card, the ID card
should be made universally accessible, at public expense for all
Gambians 18 years or older. Cost should be involved only if
replacement is needed.
It is further proposed for the Elections Act to make provision for
each registration team to be monitored by two registration agents
appointed by each registered political party and maintained by a fund
set up for that purpose and administered by the IEC.
It is strongly recommended that street names and compound numbers of
registered voters in cities and towns and kabilo names and compound
numbers of voters in villages be included in registers of voters to
detect and serve objections against those who have unlawfully
registered as voters.
6 NON INTERFERENCE OF PUBLIC SERVANTS AND THE DISCIPLINED FORCE IN
PARTISAN MATTERS
The opposition observes that Section 41 of the Constitution provides
“equal access to public facilities and the media by candidates at
public elections.”
Section 222 adds that “no public servant or member of the disciplined
force should
(a) Allow his or her political inclinations to interfere with the
discharge of his or her official duties;
b) be a member of, or take part in any association of persons which
might prevent him or her from impartially discharging his or her
duties; or
(c) take part in any activities which cast doubt on his or her
capacity to deal impartially with matters or issues which are the
concern of his or her public office or which interfere with the
performance of his or her public duties. ”
The opposition further observes that the Memorandum of understanding
between parties makes it obligatory for all parties to “respect the
full separation of powers as detailed in the constitution.
II. Not seek in any way to unduly influence or use other arms of
government for political purposes;
III. “Refrain from using Civil Servants and public funds for campaign purposes.”
.The opposition, therefore demands that all parties refrain from using
public servants, members of the disciplined force, traditional rulers,
public facilities and public funds for campaign purposes; that the
post of head of the civil service be divorced from cabinet post; that
no circular be issued to public servants by departmental heads
requesting them to participate in any matter which has partisan
objectives.
PARTISAN MATTERS
The opposition observes that Section 41 of the Constitution provides
“equal access to public facilities and the media by candidates at
public elections.”
Section 222 adds that “no public servant or member of the disciplined
force should
(a) Allow his or her political inclinations to interfere with the
discharge of his or her official duties;
b) be a member of, or take part in any association of persons which
might prevent him or her from impartially discharging his or her
duties; or
(c) take part in any activities which cast doubt on his or her
capacity to deal impartially with matters or issues which are the
concern of his or her public office or which interfere with the
performance of his or her public duties. ”
The opposition further observes that the Memorandum of understanding
between parties makes it obligatory for all parties to “respect the
full separation of powers as detailed in the constitution.
II. Not seek in any way to unduly influence or use other arms of
government for political purposes;
III. “Refrain from using Civil Servants and public funds for campaign purposes.”
.The opposition, therefore demands that all parties refrain from using
public servants, members of the disciplined force, traditional rulers,
public facilities and public funds for campaign purposes; that the
post of head of the civil service be divorced from cabinet post; that
no circular be issued to public servants by departmental heads
requesting them to participate in any matter which has partisan
objectives.
7. PROTECTION OF SECRECY OF THE BALLOT
The opposition took note of the provision of Section 40 of the
constitution which states that, “All public elections and all
referenda voting shall be by secret ballot.”
The opposition has given reasons why the voting method where Polling
agents are required by law to sit where they would not be able to know
how a voter voted but would know that only one ballot has been cast by
listening to the sound resulting from the impact of ballot tokens on
the internal baffle plate or device in each ballot box which should
emit the same sound to avoid detection, has become anachronistic and
proposes ballot papers to replace the marbles.
The opposition took note of the provision of Section 40 of the
constitution which states that, “All public elections and all
referenda voting shall be by secret ballot.”
The opposition has given reasons why the voting method where Polling
agents are required by law to sit where they would not be able to know
how a voter voted but would know that only one ballot has been cast by
listening to the sound resulting from the impact of ballot tokens on
the internal baffle plate or device in each ballot box which should
emit the same sound to avoid detection, has become anachronistic and
proposes ballot papers to replace the marbles.
8. PROTECTION FROM THE ABUSE OF INCUMBENCY
The opposition highlighted that Section 208 of the Constitution calls
on : “All state owned newspapers, journals, radio and television
shall afford fair opportunities and facilities in the presentation of
divergent views and dissenting opinion.” ‘
Since all parties are required to prepare manifestoes, we demand that
all parties are periodically given access to the state media to
explain the content of their manifestoes and debate on them.
The opposition proposes the adoption of a campaign period of three
months duration to enable the voters to be well informed and create a
level ground before elections.
The opposition highlighted that Section 208 of the Constitution calls
on : “All state owned newspapers, journals, radio and television
shall afford fair opportunities and facilities in the presentation of
divergent views and dissenting opinion.” ‘
Since all parties are required to prepare manifestoes, we demand that
all parties are periodically given access to the state media to
explain the content of their manifestoes and debate on them.
The opposition proposes the adoption of a campaign period of three
months duration to enable the voters to be well informed and create a
level ground before elections.
9. PROTECTION AGAINST OSTRACISM OR STIGMA OR DISCRIMINATION
Relying on Section 26 of the Constitution which states that, “Every
citizen of The Gambia of full age and capacity shall have the right,
without unreasonable restrictions-
(a) to take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly
or through freely chosen representatives;
(b) to vote and. stand for elections at genuine periodic elections for
public office, which election shall be by universal and equal suffrage
and be held by secret ballot;”
the opposition observed that it is reasonable restriction to bar a
child or one suffering from infirmity from standing for public
elections but would constitute unreasonable and unjustifiable
restriction to bar a Gambian from standing for public1elections who is
above the age of a child and is of sound mind and body.
.It recommends for the amendment of section 63 of the constitution so
that an upper age limit would not constitute a bar to participation as
a presidential candidate.
It is also recommended that a Gambian stationed abroad to work, study
or for any other purpose be considered to be ordinarily resident in
the Gambia.
Relying on Section 26 of the Constitution which states that, “Every
citizen of The Gambia of full age and capacity shall have the right,
without unreasonable restrictions-
(a) to take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly
or through freely chosen representatives;
(b) to vote and. stand for elections at genuine periodic elections for
public office, which election shall be by universal and equal suffrage
and be held by secret ballot;”
the opposition observed that it is reasonable restriction to bar a
child or one suffering from infirmity from standing for public
elections but would constitute unreasonable and unjustifiable
restriction to bar a Gambian from standing for public1elections who is
above the age of a child and is of sound mind and body.
.It recommends for the amendment of section 63 of the constitution so
that an upper age limit would not constitute a bar to participation as
a presidential candidate.
It is also recommended that a Gambian stationed abroad to work, study
or for any other purpose be considered to be ordinarily resident in
the Gambia.
10. The Opposition endorsed the IEC’s recommendation to the National
Assembly for electoral law review to exclude Attestation Forms from
the documents that are to be forwarded to the
Registration Officers during registration of voters” to determine
citizenship and the request to re-introduce the screening of
registration applicants by registering officers.
The opposition further supports the proposal to mandate the IEC to
demarcate boundaries before the setting up of a boundaries Commission
and hold Presidential and National Assembly Elections on the same day
using paper ballot as the system of voting.
Assembly for electoral law review to exclude Attestation Forms from
the documents that are to be forwarded to the
Registration Officers during registration of voters” to determine
citizenship and the request to re-introduce the screening of
registration applicants by registering officers.
The opposition further supports the proposal to mandate the IEC to
demarcate boundaries before the setting up of a boundaries Commission
and hold Presidential and National Assembly Elections on the same day
using paper ballot as the system of voting.
11. TWO TERM LIMITATION ON TENURE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
The opposition recommended the promulgation of a two term limit of
four or five year duration per term to enhance greater political
stability and national peace and security.
The opposition recommended the promulgation of a two term limit of
four or five year duration per term to enhance greater political
stability and national peace and security.
11. VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT
Running Mate or Election Within 90 days
The Opposition observes that Section 65 of the Constitution provides
for the assumption of the office of President by the Vice President
whenever the office of president becomes vacant and by the speaker if
there is no Vice president. To ensure that no person becomes president
who is not elected by the people we recommend the adoption of the
practice of having a running mate in contesting presidential
elections. In the event that a vacancy occurs after the running mate
assumes office we recommend that an election to the office of
President be held within 90 days after the office of president
becomes vacant, if the remaining term is more than two years. In any
other case the Speaker of the National Assembly would assume the
office for the rest of the term.
Running Mate or Election Within 90 days
The Opposition observes that Section 65 of the Constitution provides
for the assumption of the office of President by the Vice President
whenever the office of president becomes vacant and by the speaker if
there is no Vice president. To ensure that no person becomes president
who is not elected by the people we recommend the adoption of the
practice of having a running mate in contesting presidential
elections. In the event that a vacancy occurs after the running mate
assumes office we recommend that an election to the office of
President be held within 90 days after the office of president
becomes vacant, if the remaining term is more than two years. In any
other case the Speaker of the National Assembly would assume the
office for the rest of the term.
12. THE REVITALISATION OF THE INTERPARTY COMMITTEE
The opposition proposes for the revitalisation of the Interparty
Committee to enable it to serve as a forum for dialogue and
cooperation to promote participatory democracy anchoring on the level
ground required for the holding of free, fair and genuine elections.
The opposition further proposes that the Interparty Committee be given
a statutory mandate to enable it to foster dialogue on broader
Constitutional, Legal, Institutional and Administrative reforms
touching on the mandate and operations of the Executive, National
Assembly, The Judiciary, Regional Administration, the National Council
for Civic Education and the IEC in order to promote good governance,
participatory democracy and genuine elections.
The opposition proposes for the revitalisation of the Interparty
Committee to enable it to serve as a forum for dialogue and
cooperation to promote participatory democracy anchoring on the level
ground required for the holding of free, fair and genuine elections.
The opposition further proposes that the Interparty Committee be given
a statutory mandate to enable it to foster dialogue on broader
Constitutional, Legal, Institutional and Administrative reforms
touching on the mandate and operations of the Executive, National
Assembly, The Judiciary, Regional Administration, the National Council
for Civic Education and the IEC in order to promote good governance,
participatory democracy and genuine elections.
ISSUED ON 17TH JUNE 2015 BY :
GMC GPDP
NRP
NRP
PDOIS PPP
UDP
UDP
GPU calls for immediate release of Taranga FM Managing Director
The Gambia Press Union is calling for the immediate release of the manager of Teranga FM radio station, Mr Alagie Sisay, who was picked up on the night of Thursday July 2, 2015, at the premises of Teranga FM.
According to information gathered from staff and family members, two men suspected to be state security agents came for Mr Sisay shortly after breaking his fast.
A family source said: “We were sitting in the compound after Iftar. Alagie Ceesay sent someone to buy Green Tea. While we were waiting, one of his friends, Ous Sillah, came toinform him that there were two men looking for him. So, he left the compound to attend to them, but he never returned.
“Ous then followed him to enquire, but he was asked by the two men to move away, which he did. Ous later made attempt to inform family members, but it too late, as they had already left with him in a black Pajero that was parked outside the radio station.”
Four days have since passed and his whereabouts remains unknown to family and staff as well as colleagues. This is not the first time that Teranga FM has come under attack. Previous managers have on several occasions been subjected to interrogations at the NIA in relation to their work and the station itself was arbitrarily shut down three times in under five years by the state.
The family, supported by the GPU, has already lodged a complaint at the Old Yundum Police Station.
We are calling on the good office of Inspector General of Police to investigate the case of Alagie Sisay and to ensure that he reunites with his family and staff, who are missing his presence in this Holy Month of Ramadan.
The GPU is committed to the protection and promotion of press freedom and freedom of expression.
Deputies Legislate Infamous Electoral Bill
The Gambia’s rubber-stamping National Assembly this evening passed into law the infamous Electoral Amendment Bill that aims to throw out opposition from participating in elections. The controversial bill, tabled by Secretary General Lamin Nyabally, was passed by the ruling APRC deputies with slight amendments.
Due to unexplained reasons, the bill could not be presented before deputies on June 23rd and 30th. It was earlier rumoured that a split within the APRC over putting the country’s democracy on sale had led to cancellation of the bill purportedly sponsored by the Independent Electoral Commission.
The endorsed bill reduced the deposit for presidential, parliamentary and local government candidates by half. That means half a million dalasi, 50, 000 25, 000 and 10, 000 for presidential, parliamentary and local government candidates, respectively.
Another twist on the passed legislation is the question of deposit refunds. Presidential candidates who gets 40 percent of the votes will be refundedemocracyal Assembly and Mayoral candidates will be refunded provided they amass 20 percent of the valid votes cast.
The legislation that attracts anger and frustration among opposition, human rights and civil society activist maintains a portion that requires political parties to be resident in the country and allow the IEC to investigate their source of income.
Gambians are now waiting for the opposition parties’ reaction to the current development. All of them lampooned the APRC for shutting the doors to participatory democracy in a country that in the past bragged as the champion of democracy, political pluralism, the rule of law, among others.
Ends
Source.www.kaironews.com
Tuesday, 23 June 2015
EU: Rights Abuses at Home Drive Mediterranean Crisis
Migrants Detail Horrors That Caused Them to Flee
- What the European Union Should DoSustain search and rescue operations in the MediterraneanIncrease safe, legal channels for migrants and asylum seekers to enter the EUEnsure more equitable distribution of asylum seekers among EU membersTweet the recommendations
(Brussels) – Human rights abuses in their home countries are the driving force behind the surge in boat migration in the Mediterranean to reach Europe, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.EU leaders should put human rights at the heart of its response. EU leaders will meet on June 25 and 26, 2015, to discuss European Commission proposals toward a “European Migration Agenda.”
“The Mediterranean Migration Crisis: Why People Flee, What the EU Should Do,” documents the human rights abuses driving people to make the dangerous sea crossing and the shortcomings of EU migration and asylum policies. The report is based on over 150 interviews in May with recently-arrived migrants and asylum seekers in Italy – Lampedusa, Catania, and Milan – and Greece – the islands of Lesbos, Chios, Samos, Leros, and Kos. The conclusions are also based on extensive Human Rights Watch research in Syria, Eritrea, Afghanistan, andSomalia – the home countries of many of those arriving by sea.
“The Mediterranean Migration Crisis: Why People Flee, What the EU Should Do,” documents the human rights abuses driving people to make the dangerous sea crossing and the shortcomings of EU migration and asylum policies. The report is based on over 150 interviews in May with recently-arrived migrants and asylum seekers in Italy – Lampedusa, Catania, and Milan – and Greece – the islands of Lesbos, Chios, Samos, Leros, and Kos. The conclusions are also based on extensive Human Rights Watch research in Syria, Eritrea, Afghanistan, andSomalia – the home countries of many of those arriving by sea.
“The majority of those crossing the Mediterranean are taking terrible risks because they have to, not because they want to,” said Judith Sunderland, senior Western Europe researcher at Human Rights Watch and author of the report. “Saving lives and increasing safe pathways into Europe should be the EU’s priorities, while ensuring that all cooperation with countries of origin and transit countries respects international human rights standards.”
source. http://www.hrw.org/news
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)